sharing of experience

and insights

Part Two: The Mirror That Did Not Leave

Abstract digital artwork showing a small blue human figure standing at the edge of a flowing, divided field of color. Bands of yellow, purple, and blue move across a dark background, creating a sense of distance, suspension, and quiet readiness within an open threshold.

series: Mirror, Mirror Reconsidered


A Note for the Reader

(Zwischenraum)

the in-between space

What follows is part two of the small collection of mirrors.

Some speak through understanding.
Others speak through image, metaphor, and the language of lived experience.

Together, they explore the spaces between what we know and what we carry,
between what can be explained and what can only be recognized.

Recognition has its own way of arriving.
Much of what shapes a life is learned before language.
Much of what heals a life begins there as well.

If these reflections serve any purpose,
it is simply to make room.

Room for remembering.
Room for noticing.

Room for meeting ourselves with a little more honesty,
a little more tenderness,
and a little more curiosity than before.


the mirror that did not leave

It was not that we did not strive.
It was not that we were passive or unwilling.

The pain was sequestered outside of awareness —
in suspension —
in sustained effort without repair,
in staying available without being met,
in standing ready in the in-between,
prepared to respond the moment the mirror turned toward us.

The heart longed for attunement,
watching vigilantly,
perceiving the slightest shifts in attention.
To meet the gaze the instant it arrived
and savor the feeling of being felt —
even while knowing it could fracture at any moment.

Waiting like this was not neutral.

What was being lived was a paradox.

It offered just enough contact to sustain hope,
and just enough absence to require adaptation.

Over time, unspoken vows formed.

Silent agreements took shape in the body:

I will stay ready.
I will not ask for too much.
I will be here when the mirror turns.

These were not choices made freely.
They were accommodations made to remain connected.

Continuing to wait
meant continuing to disappear.

What was being asked —
implicitly, persistently,
over time —
was not patience.

It was self-erasure in exchange for brief contact.

Naming that matters.

Because this reflection does not withdraw hope.
It withdraws false hope
without collapsing the real thing.

What follows is not an invitation to stop longing.
It is an invitation to stop disappearing while we wait.

That distinction is not conceptual.

It is lived.